<Click here to sign on the following Open Letter>

Open Letter: Reconsider Risk-Benefit Analysis in Vaccinating 5-11 years old Indiscriminately

To: Minister Ong Ye Kung and Minister Chan Chun Sing,

Cc: PM Lee Hsien Loong and the Singapore Parliament

The plaque outside Singapore’s Parliament House reads: “Singapore’s parliamentary system has undergone refinements.. Some of these initiatives include the Presidential Council for Minority Rights to prevent discriminatory legislation..”

In recent months, discriminatory legislation have become a focal point in our Republic. In the name of public health, the Minister of Health has pushed new laws restricting the freedoms and rights of unvaccinated Singaporeans. In the name of protecting them, the government of Singapore has justified laws so draconian that it would destroy their employment opportunities, livelihood and freedoms.

This power exercised by the government of Singapore is not checked. There is no recourse for ordinary citizens who are affected. Many appeals and letters written to Minister Ong and his select experts appear to have fallen on deaf ears. I am not aware of any dialogues Minister Ong had arranged with concerned citizens. Instead, he and his select experts became our arbiters of truth, masters of our health and freewill. Some concerned citizens felt threatened with jail terms and fines.

Today, in my letter, I wish to urge you Minister Ong, to not usurp the rights and freedoms of the unvaccinated people of Singapore, and those who are suspected to be vaccine injured. Come, let us reason together! Your justification for pushing VDS measures to such draconian levels is not based on scientific evidence.

But the main point of my letter is intended to be about children.

Statistical data clearly points to the fact that the narrative “vaccination helps children”, is built on thin ice.

I have done my part and documented stories of several suspected vaccine injured. They include several young persons in their 20s and two persons in their 30s. The stories of these suspected vaccine injured are consistent and the gaps of the Ministry of Health glaring: there are way too many abnormalities, way too little medical investigation. There’s way too little concern (in my opinion) on the part of the government to understand, counsel, and mitigate the angry feelings and thoughts of medical negligence these victims have. There seems zero consideration on the part of MOH to pause, rethink and relook at the data again in light of these gaps.

Suffering victims expect a Health Minister – and Prime Minister – to truly care and be vexed by their unexpected woes, thus, take up responsibility over their plight. Instead, they have felt dismissed, threatened, and discriminated out of society. To them, further divisive policies lead them to conclude that the government’s interest lie not in Singaporeans nor their elected duties to act on behalf of the people.

The collective concerns of the suspected vaccine injured are of public interest – they have not been sufficiently accounted for by the government.

These millennials I interviewed belong to an age group that would not have been threatened by Covid. Now, they have all lost their health and quality of life.

This same thing now looms over our children 5-11 years old.

Now I can understand the common accusations. I must be biased. Some will call me “anti-vaxxer”, conspiracy theorist. To this I reply: run through my public profile, blog and Facebook timeline. If you could find an argument on this issue that is not reasoned with objective rationale, you can point it out to me. I can stand corrected. But it is presumptuous to assume one knows better without examining my arguments.

Moreover, what I determine to present here are solely data from the government. These are statistical info direct from the MOH and HSA. I am deliberately using official data to prove my point, so there can be no dispute that my sources are unscientific or untrustworthy. Numbers do not lie. My two sources – one from HSA and one from MOH – will show that there is contrary evidence that benefits outweigh risks in vaccinating our young.

A. Studying the risk of Adverse Events (AEs) following vaccination (HSA data)

Vaccinating children is not a zero sum game where vaccines carry zero risks. The first document I would cite is HSA’s 6th safety update which provided data for suspected adverse events (AEs) up to 30 Sep 21.

Source: https://www.hsa.gov.sg/docs/default-source/hprg-vcb/safety-update-on-covid19-vaccines/hsa-safety-update-no-6-on-covid-19-vaccines-(30-sep-2021).pdf

HSA reported 12,589 suspected AEs (0.14%) following the mRNA vaccines. (For simplicity of argument I will not include analyses for the non-mRNA vaccines):

“A total of 9,209,201 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and Moderna/Spikevaxm RNA vaccines have been administered, out of which 12,589 suspected AE reports (0.14% of administered doses) were received. Of these, 581 reports (0.006% of administered doses) were classified as serious AEs.” (Summary Pt 1; Pg 1)

Also, from the following chart HSA provided on these 12,589 suspected AEs, “injection site reactions” and “fever” – often taken to be the most typical side effects of vaccines – accounted for only a minority of 5.8% of reported AEs. The most commonly reported AE is “rash”; followed by “hives” and “angioedema (swelling of eyelids, face and lips)”. These 3 adverse effects accounted for 69.1% of AEs. Chest tightness and palpitations accounted for a significant 8.1% (about 1000 cases) of AEs.

HSA did not categorise chest tightness and palpitation under the “serious AE” category. It is my understanding though that individuals who had experienced these conditions do not consider them to be mild side effects.

In my interviews with a number of suspected vaccine injured, I understand that not all report their AEs to HSA. It is fair to assume a significant percentage of AEs will not get captured in HSA’s data. Let’s label this missing number, “M”.

HSA’s data also does not seem to include “death” as a suspected AE. This is HSA’s description of what a serious AE comprise:

“Serious AEs comprised 0.006% of doses administered. The most frequently reported serious AEs were anaphylaxis (77 reports) and other severe allergic reactions (52 reports). Other serious AEs include exacerbation of underlying asthma condition, breathing difficulty, fast heart rate, an increase or decrease in blood pressure, chest discomfort and pain, pericarditis or myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscles and the outer lining of the heart, respectively), syncope, limb numbness, weakness or pain, seizures (fits), nerve inflammation, muscle injury, joint pain, blood clots, low platelets, tinnitus (ringing in the ears), changes in vision, increase in liver enzymes, thyroid gland dysfunction, abnormal renal function, menstrual disorder, severe skin reactions and infections.” (Pt 11; Pg.5)

However, HSA’s counterparts in the US, UK and Europe have each reported at least thousands of deaths as AEs. While some of these deaths could be coincidences, I had argued that to completely disclaim every death on subjective basis would be another extreme. (http://vow.sg/is-it-possible-to-determine-if-vaccine-contributed-to-an-injury/; http://vow.sg/where-does-truth-lie/)

An Adverse Event report that fails to take into account deaths following vaccination is not just insincere. It is irresponsible and contributes to mislead public health policy, and such misinformation can end up harming thousands of Singaporeans.

Therefore, I will not dismiss, but factor in this unknown number of deaths triggered by or contributed by the Covid vaccine, as “D”. We must start tracking deaths.

To conclude, the risk of AEs for the general population is at 0.14%, but about “6%” of these AEs involved mild negligible symptoms of fever and reaction at injection site. However, “M” (missing AEs) and “D” (unrecorded deaths) have not been factored in. To better highlight key public health considerations, I would re-indicate the risk of AEs as 0.14*6%-M-D.

B. Studying the risk of Covid (MOH data)

The risks of Covid include death and “serious Covid” e.g. where oxygen or intensive care treatment is required. For this data, I took a sample of numbers from MOH, from the dates 14-Oct-21 to 10-Nov-21.

Source: https://www.moh.gov.sg/news-highlights/details/update-on-local-covid-19-situation-(10-nov-2021)

These dates I used for my sample are purely coincidental. They were the first set of data I saw when I begin to study these numbers more intently. This data is based on 80,512 infected Singaporeans and should be representative. I will support MOH to run through all 200k infected cases for even more accurate analysis.

i) MOH data on Serious Covid

Figure 3 from source. Alternative weblink: https://www.moh.gov.sg/images/librariesprovider5/covid-19-chart-(pr)/fig3_10nov21.png

Findings: For adults below 40 years old, serious Covid was rare. And for children below 20 years old, almost none needed oxygen or intensive care treatment.

ii) MOH data on fatality from Covid

The next chart (also from MOH) shows the infection and fatality numbers over these same dates. From this chart I calculated the fatality rate according to age groups.

Figure 5 from source. Alternative weblink: https://www.moh.gov.sg/images/librariesprovider5/covid-19-chart-(pr)/fig5_10nov21.png

 

The threat of Covid decreases exponentially down the age groups. Overall, fatality rate of Covid is only 0.004%.

Findings: Adults <40 are 1500 times (estimated) more resilient than elderlies >70!

The data reveals that the fatality rate of elderlies 70 years old and above (4.4%) is 7 times that of 60-69 years old (0.66%), which is 9 times that of 40-59 years old (0.076%); which is 25 times that of 20-39 years old (0.003%). From this percentages, adults below 40 years old are 1,500 times more resilient compared to elderlies 70 years old and above, where 4 out of 100 of them died from Covid.

 

Findings: Children are even more resilient than adults <40, regardless of vaccination status!

Children and teens are even more resilient against Covid compared to young adults below 40! There were zero deaths for age groups 12-19 years old and 0-11 years old. This resilience is true regardless of vaccination status. Our 0-11 years old children have yet to be vaccinated but Covid does not threaten them.

C. Comparing risk of AEs to risk of Covid across age groups

i) Elderlies > 70 years old

Elderlies >70 years old are at highest risk of Covid with a 4.4% fatality rate. Adults with comorbidities would also be in emergency of serious Covid. These numbers outweigh the risks of AEs, which on the surface sits at 0.14% – but it is important to re-evaluate using AE as 0.14*6%-M-D before we make this conclusion.

ii) Adults and children <40 years old

However, healthy adults <40 years old are not really threatened by serious Covid. Their fatality rate is at 0.003%. In fact, there are only two fatalities in this age group as of 10-Nov, where there have been about 200k infections – and both were noted by MOH to have “multiple underlying medical conditions”.

Therefore, if we know that children are even multiple times more resilient than young adults, it will be hard to justify an emergency among children. Instead, children 12-19 years old are reported by HSA to be ten times higher in risk of myocarditis (5.9 per 100,000 doses) following vaccination compared to adults above 30 years old (0.59 per 100,000 doses):

“HSA received 81 local reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following more than 8.9 million doses of mRNA vaccines administered in Singapore. The incidence rate per 100,000 doses are: 5.9 for those aged 12-19 years old, 1.8 for those aged 20-29years old, and 0.59 for those aged 30 years and above.. 47 cases which occurred in those below 30 years of age..” (Pt 17, Pg. 6)

Already, 47 individuals below the age of 30 had developed myocarditis / pericarditis following vaccination. HSA also reported 616 AEs among teens:

“Since the roll out of the vaccination programme in students aged 12 years and above on 3 June 2021, HSA has received 616 AE reports (0.1% of doses administered) associated with the use of Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty or Moderna/Spikevax vaccine in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years old.” (Pt 10, Pg.4)”

In summary, 1 out of 1000 teens (0.1%) reported an AE while 1 out of 17,000 teens (0.006%) developed myocarditis / pericarditis following vaccination. These are grave – and unnecessary – AE risks when in comparison, the risk of serious Covid in healthy teens is negligible.

Conclusions

1. Reconsider Risk-Benefit Analysis in Vaccinating 5-11 years old indiscriminately

I hereby appeal to Minister Ong to reconsider the risk-benefit analysis in vaccinating 5-11 years old indiscriminately. The current evidence does not justify vaccinating children in light of the real threat of AEs like myocarditis etc. Actual AE numbers could also be much higher and serious AEs like deaths could have been omitted, contributing to grave inaccuracies guiding our public health policies. There’s a clear lack of evidence of an emergency among children that vaccination-differentiated measures can be reasonably justified.

2. Re-evaluate vaccines MORE as a bi-annual lifelong drug than typical one-time childhood vaccine

The benefits of vaccines have also been overstated. They were touted to be at 95% efficacy and capable of ending the pandemic when they first rolled out. Now, we have realised these numbers were not absolute figures, and in reality, vaccines did not prevent infection. In fact, their efficacy drastically reduces such that boosters are required. Each booster carries risk of AE that gets multiplied with repeated jabs lifelong.

3. Be careful of overpromising on the benefits of vaccines against MIS-C

I also would wish to comment on the recent attention on multisystem inflammatory syndrome in Children (MIS-C). First, MIS-C is not serious Covid. It’s a rare condition that occurs 4-6 weeks following a COVID-19 infection. As it is a post-Covid condition, we should not assume vaccination will help children avoid MIS-C if they get Covid. Second, there is also literature on children developing MIS-C following vaccination. We should not oversell vaccines as the solution to MIS-C knowing vaccines do not prevent infection.

4. Avoid using Bad Math to represent vaccine benefits

Also, some have used MOH’s numbers to erroneously conclude that the unvaccinated are 11 times more vulnerable to serious Covid. This number is derived by comparing the percentages of serious Covid in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. However, both percentages are for now, more indicative of our quick rates of vaccination. E.g. if 1 out of 100 vaccinated is in ICU today – the percentage of vaccinated in ICU is 1%; but if we ramp up vaccination rates such that within a day 100,000 people are now vaccinated – that percentage instantly gets depressed to 0.001%. And the percentage of unvaccinated in ICU, being inversely proportional, will get inflated. Since “Rate of Covid Infection is less than Rate of Vaccination”, covid infection needs to “catch up” (especially with the 94% vaccinated group) until the proportion of “Covid-infected versus uninfected” in both populations equalises.

5. Segregation along vaccinated and unvaccinated is meaningless and will harm children’s mental health instead

I also appeal to Minister Chan to not implement meaningless discriminatory measures segregating vaccinated or unvaccinated students in any way. As explained, youths are resilient to serious Covid regardless of their vaccinated status. It’s great to practice prudence, but it’s harmful to be excessive with fear. As a counselor, I know that social segregation based on vaccination status will have repercussions on students’ mental health. We have not lost a single student to Covid but we have already seen suicides and mental health issues rose among the youths during the pandemic. Vaccination-differentiation measures against unvaccinated students will add to this harmful trend. Please do not continue this dreadful trend, and reverse these policies in Secondary Schools and Tertiary Institutions as well, to protect our children’s lives.

6. Stop VDS measures against all unvaccinated citizens

Lastly, I like to point out that the fatality rate of Covid on all citizens is at 0.004%. Healthy Singaporeans below 40 years old are more likely to be threatened by dengue than they are by Covid. VDS measures must be thought through again. Else, the Singaporean government would not escape accusations of power abuse or totaliarianism. Perhaps there might be a place to discuss VDS measures for the elderlies or for those with underlying medical conditions (regardless of vaccination status), but to usurp one’s freewill against their wish is still draconian. I had been a supporter of the Singaporean government all my life. It pains me to say all this. I wish this ends.

 

By Concerned citizen, counselor, Leo Hee Khian

 

***Letter Ends***

 

It’s one thing to write an open letter. It’s another thing if thousands of Singaporeans sign off with me. Will you consider joining me as a signatory in this letter? Please click here and sign if you believe in my cause. Let we the people raise our voice as one.

Open Letter to Reconsider Vaccinating Kids 5-11

46 thoughts on “Open Letter to Reconsider Vaccinating Kids 5-11

  • November 22, 2021 at 4:06 pm
    Permalink

    If the vaccine rolls out, as a mother, and I bring my 2 boys in for the jab. And adverse effects happen, I will never be able to forgive myself as a parent. Until properly researched, I believe the vaccine should not be rolled out. They are the future generation that needs protection from jabs that have not even gone thru proper research.

    Reply
    • November 28, 2021 at 2:50 pm
      Permalink

      Thank you for standing and voice out for many of us, as parent of 2-yo boy, I strongly agree, any new vaccine must be given enough time and tested properly before applying to human beings, no matter working adults, kids or seniors.

      There is no alternative for time.

      Covid was there less than 2 years ago only, how long was the development period for vaccine then?

      The world is damn crazy to test on majority of population and now touch young kids, our future.

      Gov must stop doing this, all sins are to be judged by Lord. Follow the truth, dig out till the very bottom, all plans will be revealled. Justice is never absent.

      Reply
  • November 22, 2021 at 11:40 pm
    Permalink

    Children immunity is developing. What happen to what we know? Seems all been warped to self agenda. So sad. May God bless those who are suffering and bring justice on evil ones and cast them to hell.

    Reply
    • November 30, 2021 at 7:40 pm
      Permalink

      I kept seeing Cna helping the govt promote this agenda recently am and getting concerned if Mr OYK is going to take away jobs of working parents who refused to vax their small kids in future just like how he threatened the rice bowl of unvaxxed people who have worked hard to contribute taxes. I know it is ridiculous because of this I put off having a second kid as it is terrifying to be living in such a society where our opinions are not respected at all so thank you Doctor for speaking my mind!

      Aside from this I believe it is the TRUST level towards the govt is currently very low. I always remember. 1. When covid first arrived in Sg, many of us were informed via world news to wear a mask but our own govt said no need but later took back their words 2. When a teenager had vaccine injury- heart inflammation, Mr LW immediately said it is not due to vaccine but later on studies shown that there is a link and he was compensated..3. When we are opening up borders, the mtf was the one who said children are not so affected by Delta so why the need to intro vax now? It just goes to show they themselves do not know the long term effects of this delta variant but why say things then and now to suit the circumstances? In addition, I am concerned our data is showing many partially vaxxed people dying – % almost on par with unvaxxed. Pls clarify are they really dying due to covid or the first jab? Have a thorough investigation being done or their death just treated like a number? Please consider having a rating system like Japan or a mid term voting system so we can have a say on who we want to lead the MTF too

      Reply
  • November 23, 2021 at 1:06 am
    Permalink

    I’m sadden that children’s have to be vaccinated at a young age as they should , in they phase of life build a strong immunity of the body. Some maybe premature born , which made them much weaker to take the vaccine, while other may have allergies
    which must take into it account. I do not agree on my opinion that vaccination for young children’s should be taken as a mandate , I’m not against vaccination, but I have to weight the clause of my own body make up to make a right decision.

    Reply
  • November 23, 2021 at 11:13 am
    Permalink

    I agree and I support this

    Reply
    • November 23, 2021 at 2:23 pm
      Permalink

      I am wary for my 2 young girls 7 and 9.
      May the children be given their own immunity to fight against the virus.
      God please have mercy on them.

      Reply
    • November 24, 2021 at 6:30 am
      Permalink

      I support this. By the way, many ppl including academics hv been misled by the MOH presentation of data. They miss out that the rolling 7-day average is per 100,000 & said the number of critical illness & deaths of unvacc (which incl prob a high number of partially vacc eg Dr. Raymond Yuen, RIP, 2 weeks later after his 1st jab passed on.
      Also UK US Norway & Israel are thro their study & data, that vaccination is Not for 70 & above esply they are still very likely to get infected Covid19 seriously even with booster. Happening in S’p too. Norway has suspended vacc the 70 & above as some have their medical conditions aggravated or even passed on.

      Reply
    • November 24, 2021 at 4:34 pm
      Permalink

      The experimental mRNA vaccine is unsafe. It must not be given to the 5 to 11 Children who are our future generstion. Why?

      Because there is now proof that it is extremely dangerous.

      https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/finally-medical-proof-covid-jab-murder

      One way out is to vaccinate the 5 to 11 with inactivated Sars-Cov-2 vaccines like Sinovac or Sinopharm vaccines which are safe.

      Reply
  • November 23, 2021 at 3:17 pm
    Permalink

    Well said, Dr Yang. I support you!

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 2:04 am
    Permalink

    Wearing masks in school is already detrimental to our little children. I hope the govt. will seriously not to give the vaccines to these children nor make any decision on the vaccine differentiation among our children in school n at play. IF this should happen…our little ones 5yrs to 11yrs and even beyond will affect their mental health. All these including the risk of the side effects of the MRNA vaccines is very scary for our young parents.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 2:19 am
    Permalink

    It pains to read your letter, even more painful as it contains more truths than much of the misinformation and disinformation contained in the mainstream media. I appeal to the authorities- please stop this insanity immediately. If nothing else is important to you, please value the lives of the people of Singapore, especially the very young. Please don’t play with their future. .

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 4:16 am
    Permalink

    Founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew said he wanted the vaccine to be 300 per cent safe, not just 100 per cent safe.

    How safe is the Pfizer C19 vaccine?

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 5:15 am
    Permalink

    Do not touch the children or else the blood of the children will be upon the hands of the authorities who impose the vaccines upon them. They do not need the vaccines.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 5:57 am
    Permalink

    I had been a caregiver with mountains of questions to the parameters for a my parents, Inlaw and my sis with ovarian cancer!!!

    No one can touch “MY CHILD” over my dead body!!!

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 6:43 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for your letter. I fully support your effort. I wrote to the minister of health too and was not satisfied with his reply based on scientific research. Much research is required in this area to determine the long-term effect of mRNA vaccines.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 7:20 am
    Permalink

    Halt vaccination totally! No way to be given to children! Stop the Madness!!

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 7:52 am
    Permalink

    Agree and fully support. Have always respected n supported the Govt but am truely very sad and dissapointed about how citizens of Singapore can be treated as outcasts for a choice we make on a experimental drug that is supposed to be voluntary. Now it will be used against the young n next generation of Singaporeans.
    Very Conerned Citizen

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 8:21 am
    Permalink

    I am not against immunization. All my children are immunized – MMR, etc, because these have been tested and proven for years. But not, Covid vaccination. Please, I am pleading as a mother, I don’t want to be mommy-shamed for not vaccinating my children or my children being shunned/feared because they are not. Please protect our children’s physical and mental well-being. Please.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 8:27 am
    Permalink

    Singaporeans are not against immunization. Singaporean adults vaccinate because we have to and we know our bodies. All my children are immunized – MMR, etc. But covid vaccine, still new and needs more testing to be done. I don’t want to be mommy-shamed for not vaccinating my kids or my children shunned/feared because they aren’t. Please protect their mental well-being.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 9:00 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for doing this for the people who do not have a voice. I pray that God will open the hearts of our ministers and listen to the victims.

    Reply
    • November 25, 2021 at 4:03 am
      Permalink

      This is a really excellent analysis. I was tracking certain aspects of MOH daily data until the format was changed.

      I belong to the group you call ‘M’.

      I had my booster on 9 Nov. On 26th I started to have a temperature which went as high as 38.2C briefly but stayed between 37.4 to 37.8 thru the next day.

      During the evening of 16th, I had a sharp pain in my right chest and my heart beat rate shot up to as high as 122. Because I am on medication for hypertension and high chlosterol for a long term, and because I had a bypass in Oct 2020, I monitor my blood pressure at least twice a day. My blood pressure also shot up and the monitor showed palpatition. I took my prescription medication for slowing the heart rate and after a while it came down to just below 100.

      I then did 2 ART tests within 3 hours, both were negative. Just before 9pm I called my regular GP. He advised me to go to the hospital A&E if the heart rate continues above 100.

      I visited him the next day by which time the heart rate was back to below 100 and the blood pressure normal with the usual medication. He found nothing abnormal.

      For the next 3 days, I did at least one ART test a day. All were negative.

      Since then, my heart rate has behaved rather erractically and I’m trying to get an appointment with my regular consultant cardiologist at the SKH.

      Reply
      • November 26, 2021 at 7:22 am
        Permalink

        Sorry to learn about it Eugene. Hope everything will be okay for you health. Thank you for sharing

        Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 10:57 am
    Permalink

    I am a mother of two young children and I am very concerned our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, would mandate our kids and us adults to be injected with the COVID-19 jabs.

    I would thus like our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, to signed my “COVID-19 Injection Mandate Personal Liability Contract Agreement” (see below) to indicate they are willing to PERSONALLY take over my future and present responsibilities in the event I encounter deadly and/or incapacitating ADVERSE OUTCOMES from the COVID-19 injection I am forced to take, to just be able to stay employed (or for my children to stay in school).

    According to U.S. CDC VAERS COVID-19 Vaccines Summary from Dec 2020 till Oct 22, 2021, there were already 837,595 Adverse Reactions and 17,619 Deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, and this total number of deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is already far greater than the number of deaths associated with all other vaccines combined since the year 1990
    If our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, want to enforce and mandate the mRNA injection on me, then they have to be held PERSONALLY liable for the Adverse Events and Death Risks associated with the COVID-19 injection, not me.
    Especially so, since our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, are Demanding me to ABANDON and SACRIFICE my valid concern for health and death risks, my sincerely-held PERSONAL and Religious Beliefs and Convictions, my Conscience, and my Constitution Rights, to conform to their demands.
    Once our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, are willing to sign my COVID-19 Injection Mandate Personal Liability Contract Agreement in exchange for the Risks and Sacrifice they are imposing on me, then there is ground to mandate compliance.
    Will our Singapore Health Ministers and the Ministers in the Parliament, including PM Lee Hsien Loong, be willing to sign my Contract Agreement?

    COVID-19 Injection Mandate Assumption of Personal Liability Contract Agreement

    This agreement was entered willingly, without duress or coercion, on this date __________________ day (___) of the month of _______________, in the Year ________, between:

    _________________________, NRIC _______, aged ______, the breadwinner of her family and a citizen of Singapore (hereforth referred to as “Singaporean”) and
    PM Lee Hsien Loong and all the Ministers within the Singapore Parliament who have implicitly and explicitly been involved in the rollout and/or the continuance of the COVID-19 Injection Mandate, including but not limited to: ___________________________________________ (name/position/department within the Singapore Parliament: _________________________________) (hereforth referred to as “Government”);

    It is herein acknowledged and agreed between the parties:

    Government, in various roles and in various degree of capacity and involvement, initiates, carries out, and/or assists in carrying out policies and procedures related to the COVID-19 Injection Mandate, for Singaporean to be injected with the COVID-19 injection in order for her to be able to further her employment or studies, and existence, within Singapore.
    Singaporean has ZERO health issues or comorbidity, as proven by her latest health report;
    Singaporean has submitted Request for Exemption or Accommodation for her sincerely-held personal and religious belief against the COVID-19 Injection, and Singaporean’s Request for Exemption or Accommodation has been denied;
    With this Agreement, Singaporean agrees to comply with the Government’s rolled-out COVID-19 Injection Mandate – against her valid concern for serious health and death risks, against her sincerely-held personal and religious belief, against her Constitution Rights, against her conscience;
    With this Agreement, Government agrees to be held in total and complete PERSONAL LIABILITY for Singaporean’s following occurrence – whether occurrence is deemed to be related to the COVID-19 Injection(s) or not, or whether occurrence is one or many, alone or together – once Singaporean is injected with the FIRST of a series of COVID-19 injections, (hereforth referred to as “Events”), namely:
    changes in health status, including but not limited to physical, spiritual, mental, emotional, cognitive
    adverse events
    disabilities
    death
    Once Events occurs, Government agrees that the following becomes Government’s responsibilities, including but not limited to:
    All future costs of education Singaporean’s two young children, ____________ and _____________ (names of sons) , presently aged ___, may incur, until they complete their education to the highest level they are able to attain;
    All future living expenses for ______________ (name of Singaporean), her husband _____________ (name of husband), both her two young sons _______________ and ______________ (names of sons), and both her mother _______________ (name of mother) and her grandmother ______________ (name of grandmother), including but not limited to mortgage payments, transportation costs, daily expenses, electrical bills, water bills, phone bills, internet bills, yearly travel leisures, etc;
    All future medical bills and/or insurance for _____________ (name of Singaporean) until her death, her husband _____________ (name of husband) until his death, both her two young sons _____________ and _____________ (names of sons) until they complete their education to the highest level they are able to attain;
    All compensations for the pain and sufferings;
    All legal fees that all the parties are involved in to contest this Agreement.

    Herein signed by the parties:

    ____________________________________________

    Sinagporean’s Name / Signature / Date

    ____________________________________________

    Government’s Name / Signature / Date

    In the presence of Witness or Attorney in Law:

    ____________________________________________
    Witness or Attorney In Law’s Name / Signature / Date

    Witness or Law Office Name

    Witness or Law Office Address

    Witness or Law Office Telephone

    Witness or Attorney in Law’s Email Address

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 1:55 pm
    Permalink

    Its our kids.Not your lab rats. Some of us have only one son who is also the only descendent in our lineage.Don t cut off our family line if Minister Ong still has some conscience left.Don t force us to be childless for life because we cannot have another child anymore. Leave our kids alone please.You can t return any dead or permanently damaged child back to their family.Its a lifetime of anguish and grief for any affected families that your measly SGD225, 000 can never compensate this life or your next.

    Reply
  • November 24, 2021 at 2:07 pm
    Permalink

    Senseless vaccination. Everybody , every body is different 。 Not everyone needs the same vaccination .

    Reply
  • November 25, 2021 at 2:46 am
    Permalink

    Yes I agree.

    Reply
  • November 25, 2021 at 5:15 am
    Permalink

    A few months ago, I put forward a proposal to Minister Ong on a national experiment to test the efficacy of vaccination using 2 cruise ships. It doesn’t involve children. If your MMTF is gungho about experimenting our children on mandatory vaccination, it defies logic why you’d not consider an experiment involving willing unvaxxed adults who’re prepared to stake on their natural immunity against the virus.

    Reply
  • November 25, 2021 at 10:35 am
    Permalink

    Very sad and disappointed that our children are valued as guinea pigs for experimental treatments without any safety data. Please stop this!

    Reply
  • November 26, 2021 at 1:14 am
    Permalink

    Your emphasis on the vulnerability of elderlies and comment that VDS would be more appropriate for elderlies. I have read another open letter which also says the same. Since Singaporeans (represented by your open letters) feel VDS is more appropriate for elderlies, we wouldn’t blame the authorities if they impose draconian VDS on the elderlies. But I would like to refer you to what the Bible says about honoring the elderlies. Start with the 10 commandments

    Reply
    • November 26, 2021 at 2:42 am
      Permalink

      @Jennifer: I appreciate your comment for the elderlies but I think you missed out my point which says it will be draconian of government to still push VDS to the elderlies and those with underlying medical conditions. I never supported VDS and will not be for it but I needed to put myself in government’s perspective to see why they are justifying VDS in the first place, else I would be unable to provide a constructive feedback to them.

      Reply
  • November 26, 2021 at 3:26 am
    Permalink

    Seems well written & thought out, until the last paragraph. I’m always sceptical of arguments from freedom & individual rights given our Asian, if not SG, context. Ours, in a good way, is not like the democracies of the West. That is not to say that, at this juncture, freedom & personal rights aren’t important. It’s just best, for now, to stick to statistics & science – the language of our technocrats!

    Reply
    • November 26, 2021 at 7:17 am
      Permalink

      @Yvonne Toh, I do not disagree with you in general. Public Good above Individual Freedom – I have written about it even to the forums. But Public Good does not mean Big Government. We should not hence assume every government agenda as public good. And health is an area that goes beyond Freedom – it is your Life. I can agree with mandating NS – it takes 2 years of my freedom. But the robbing away of freewill to decide for our health, to mandate vaccination on an entire population is another matter altogether, and is an extremely dangerous idea.

      Reply
      • November 27, 2021 at 3:17 pm
        Permalink

        exactly, we as citizen need to voice out, just like other citizens in Singapore speak up on LGBT issue and the government hear them out loud.

        We can do the same

        Reply
      • November 29, 2021 at 3:13 am
        Permalink

        Hi Leo, no automatic assumption of government agenda = public good on my part in my comment above. Still, the pursuit of public good, especially in times of crises, can sometimes blind governments from other valid concerns.
        Thanks for breaking it down thus in your reply: your argument for personal life (instead of freedom & rights) versus public good (livelihood of others & national economy) makes for a more substantial argument.

        Reply
      • November 29, 2021 at 3:16 am
        Permalink

        By the way, Leo, is there any way I can re-examine / edit my comment to the ministers? Thanks.

        Reply
  • November 26, 2021 at 6:00 am
    Permalink

    If any of our minister, have children or grand children between 5 to 11, please go ahead and get them vaccinated. Since children that caught covid usually dont shown symptom, why rush.
    Let the ministers, family, children take the vaccine 1st, the parents of the children will then decide either 2 years later or more.
    By the way, if the vaccine contain fetus cell, should we even use it?

    Reply
  • November 26, 2021 at 6:51 am
    Permalink

    My 20 mths old grandson who had covid right after his 5 in 1 jab was experiencing side effects of his jab. But thank God, his antibodies was better than ours after recovery.
    Parents & myself, unvaxed, were infected when pregnant DIL, got it from her vaxed colleague in September. Son later found out he had hernia during isolation & I’d pre-existing conditions to cope with but having been through serious health challenges, I believed that God has toughened up my immune system as I was the last to test positive. We relied on treatment protocols from our research which was already in place since 2020 that’s inexpensive. Hope our government will be transparent in all aspects of covid management

    Reply
  • November 26, 2021 at 4:23 pm
    Permalink

    When it comes to health and mortality, it’s not a race to show the world. There’s wisdom in observing and seeking counsel. The key personnel in the task force are made up of chief executives and senior positions, and they may be disconnected from their practice.

    Reply
  • November 28, 2021 at 5:57 am
    Permalink

    What is the government’s secret contract with vaccine companies that require 100% compliance from its citizens? Do we need to sacrifice our lives and face injuries in order to help government fulfil its contract?

    My helper beg me not to let her vac as her helper friends in Singapore suffer from 1) constant headaches after vac 2) breast lumps visible externally.

    Even though I’m responsible for her hospitalization if she doesn’t vac, can I have a heart not to listen to her plea for mercy?

    And now they are coming for our innocent young lives. How many of those below the age of 12 has died, if they have no co-morbidities? None, so what’s the reason to vaccinate our children. There will be more vaccine deaths than Covid deaths!!!

    Yet our government is not listening to our plea but prefers to shame us, divide us, trying all means to make us take experimental vaccine otherwise we are kept apart from society etc. Such is the government I voted in. Shame on me….

    Reply
  • November 28, 2021 at 9:16 pm
    Permalink

    I’m grateful for this platform. We parents must stand together and fight for our kids. They are still growing. Their immunity is stronger than these vaccines. Please spare the kids!

    Reply
  • November 30, 2021 at 4:16 am
    Permalink

    It is not just Singaporean’s who share this sentiment. A lot of expats also share the same view and wish not to vaccinate their children.

    Reply
  • November 30, 2021 at 2:18 pm
    Permalink

    Look, I don’t read “mainstream local media”. I don’t actually know what slant the government puts on on it, specifically. BUT… you guys do know that death is not the only indicator of how covid affects people, right? Long covid anyone? Look up the term. Look for descriptions about it from other countries. Persistent symptoms for months after leaving hospital. Alive, but unable to work due to fatigue, dizziness, pain, organ damage. In children too.

    STOP USING DEATH AS THE ONLY MEASURE OF COVID ON AN INDIVIDUAL!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.